
Is Our Model of Dark Energy Wrong? | New 4.2σ Results
Season 11 Episode 5 | 19m 3sVideo has Closed Captions
The biggest news in cosmology in recent years is that dark energy may be fading away.
The biggest news in cosmology in recent years is that the mysterious universe-accelerating entity we call dark energy may be fading away. The evidence for this is now strong enough that enormous effort is going into confirming this result. So what’s it going to take, and when are we going to know?
Problems playing video? | Closed Captioning Feedback
Problems playing video? | Closed Captioning Feedback

Is Our Model of Dark Energy Wrong? | New 4.2σ Results
Season 11 Episode 5 | 19m 3sVideo has Closed Captions
The biggest news in cosmology in recent years is that the mysterious universe-accelerating entity we call dark energy may be fading away. The evidence for this is now strong enough that enormous effort is going into confirming this result. So what’s it going to take, and when are we going to know?
Problems playing video? | Closed Captioning Feedback
How to Watch PBS Space Time
PBS Space Time is available to stream on pbs.org and the free PBS App, available on iPhone, Apple TV, Android TV, Android smartphones, Amazon Fire TV, Amazon Fire Tablet, Roku, Samsung Smart TV, and Vizio.
Providing Support for PBS.org
Learn Moreabout PBS online sponsorshipthe biggest news in cosmology in# recent years is that the mysterious universe accelerating entity that# we call dark energy may be fading away the evidence for this is now strong# enough that enormous effort is going into confirming the result so what's it going# to take and when are we going to know in the '90s we thought cosmology was solved the# universe is expanding and slowing down under the influence of gravity in an effort to nail down# this result astronomers tracked the expansion history of the universe by watching the flashes# of distant supernova they found that expansion wasn't slowing down at all it was speeding up# we don't know what mysterious influence causes this acceleration but we've named it dark energy# the most mainstream interpretation is that the vacuum of space has a native energy to it quantum# mechanics predicts this to be the case even if it can't predict the quantity this idea also gives# us the simplest mathematical description of dark energy the addition of a single number the# cosmological constant lambda to the Einstein equations and we saw in another video that# this result is a constant energy density and a resulting exponential expansion this simplest# version of dark energy is part of the lambda CDM cosmological model and historically it's done# a pretty good job of describing the expansion history and the growth of structure through# cosmic time with lambda CDM we thought that we were back to cosmology being mostly solved# time to tie up the loose ends once again by refining the measurement of the expansion history# to verify the dark energy is indeed constant many thought that the dark energy science instrument# would do just that confirm lambda CDM it didn't desi seems to be showing the dark energy isn't# constant at all rather it may be decreasing in strength which puts in doubt the whole vacuum# energy thing we first reported this result last year after Desi's first data release when the# hint of a changing dark energy was just that a hint desi's second data release has now promoted# this tenuous result to a confidence level just shy of a formal detection that was a few months# ago now and so this is not a news piece about the new result instead this episode is really about# what comes next what measurements can and will we make next to confirm that dark energy is changing# to better measure how it's changing and what this can tell us about what dark energy really is that# said a quick overview of DESIE is in order the dark energy science instrument is an instrument# it's the survey conducted by that instrument and it's the nearly 500 person collaboration behind# it all the instrument is on the male telescope at Kit Peak in Arizona it robotically places 5,000# optical fibers to simultaneously capture the light of as many galaxies that light has traveled to# us for billions of years in some cases through an expanding universe and the signature of that# expansion is imprinted in the stretching or red shift of each galaxy's light by splitting the# light of each galaxy with a spectrograph the Desi team can measure that red shift which encodes# both the distance to each galaxy and the expansion history during that light's journey these two# properties can't be disentangled without more information and so Desi does something else# incredibly cool remember we want to measure the expansion history perhaps the simplest way# to think about it is that we want to measure how big the universe was at different times in# the past light takes time to reach us so light from distant galaxies carries a snapshot from# an earlier time next we just need some sort of structure that has expanded with the universe# so we can measure the size of the universe at different times in the case of Desi that something# is the baron acoustic oscillations Baos which we discussed in previous episodes these are gigantic# circular patterns in the distribution of galaxies on the sky they are the remnants of sound waves# in the hot dense plasma that filled the early universe before the first galaxies formed these# density waves froze at a certain size when the first atoms formed leaving a ripple pattern in# the gas and dark matter that filled the universe the galaxies that would later form from that# matter still reflect that patterning but the ripples have grown with the universe they now# give us a powerful standard ruler to track that expansion so simplistically we have red shift that# encodes the subsequent expansion history from a given time in the past and then we have a measure# of the scale of the universe at those times this doesn't quite give us an unambiguous expansion# history by itself but the combination does allow desi to test the consistency of different models# of that history different cosmological models in the case of Desi the cosmological models tested# include lambda CDM with its constant dark energy as well as a particular model for changing dark# energy in that model dark energy changes over time according to an equation given in the form of# a varying equation of state parameter something we talked about in the previous video by itself Desi# finds that the model with changing dark energy has only a marginal improvement over lambda CDM but# things get much more interesting when the desi data is combined with other studies the first# is the constraints from the cosmic microwave background radiation which provides the starting# point the initial conditions from which cosmic expansion and structure formation measured by desi# will evolve the other is an independent measure of distance desi itself only has the galaxy red shift# as a distance indicator which makes it difficult to pin down the absolute scale of these BAO rings# so they add an independent measure the same type that was first used to discover dark energy type# 1A supernova these exploding white dwarf stars are called standard candles because they explode with# predictable brightnesses that means we can figure out how far away they are based on how faint they# appear due to that distance one way to think about it is that the supernova give distances from# us to the galaxies while the barrier acoustic oscillations give distances between those galaxies# standard candles plus standard rulers combined with the initial conditions from the CMBB these# measurements give a much tighter constraint on their cosmological parameters desi claims that# the combination favors a cosmology in which dark energy is actually weakening and that this differs# from the cosmological constant model by up to 4.2 sigma for the supernova in Desi's own survey but a# bit less than 4.2 for other supernova surveys this doesn't quite reach the five sigma level required# to claim a discovery but it's tantalizingly close so did Desi probably discover that dark energy# isn't constant not really besides not quite hitting five sigma they also test this one version# of varying dark energy which you could argue is a little ad hoc when you're fitting a curve to a# bunch of points adding extra degrees of freedom always improves the apparent fit that could be# what's happening here still it's intriguing enough to warrant deeper exploration what we really want# is a precision measurement of the way expansion and dark energy have changed over cosmic time# because that would allow us to a be sure that the change is really happening and b distinguish# between different models of dark energy which in turn could tell us what dark energy really is now# we've talked about those options before so I won't go into it now i want to focus on what's needed# and what's being done to improve this measurement how do we improve the desi result well the answer# is a little prosaic I'm afraid we just need to do everything better let me remind you of the# three things we talked about now this is an oversimplification but it serves to organize# the ideas we need to one measure the starting state of the universe two to measure the size# of the universe at different times and three to measure distances to those different times we'll# dispense with number one quickly measuring the starting state means measuring the initial density# distributions and various energetic components of the universe from the cosmic microwave background# there are plans to do this better than the plank satellite already has but honestly our current# CMB map is the most precise part of this whole calculation so it's not the limiting factor so# straight on to number two how can we improve our measurement of the size of the universe well# Barryon acoustic oscillations really are the gold standard and so just doing desi better is# probably the way to go that means we need bigger better galaxy red shift surveys which beat down# the uncertainty in various ways including the sheer number of galaxies we also want to push# the measurement back further in time which we can do with more sensitive instruments on bigger# telescopes or just staring at the sky for longer to collect photons from fainter galaxies and# three we also want to improve our measurement of distances to those galaxies the most obvious thing# is to improve our supernova measurements with more type 1A but also by refining our calibration of# these things as standard candles this is one of the most contentious points in the whole effort# because the supernova distances piggyback off a chain of distance measurements and so errors can# have crept in unnoticed in various places major efforts are underway to weed out potential issues# it's also important to find independent ways to get those distances one of the most exciting and a# personal favorite of mine is to use gravitational lensing gravity bends space and so bends the# path of light very strong gravitational fields like those of entire galaxies bend space so much# that the light from a distant source can travel to us via multiple separate paths for example# distant quazars feeding super massive black holes sometimes appear duplicated or even quadrupled# around a galaxy that happens to lie directly between us and it now when that quazar fluctuates# in brightness all of these lensed images also fluctuate because they're all the same quazar but# the pattern of fluctuations has an offset in time that reflects the difference in the lengths of# these paths measuring this time delay actually gives us a measure of the cosmic distances# that's completely independent of the supernova measurements astronomers have used a handful of# lensed quazars to measure the expansion rate of the whole universe but by doing this for many more# such objects we can also get the expansion history now I was being a little simplistic when I# separated the ideas of measuring the size of the universe at different times to measuring# the distance to those times really any given cosmological measurement does some of both# for example we track the size of the universe just by looking at how far apart galaxies are in# general not just the size of the BAO rings so this size information is also there for example in the# supernova cataloges even without the BAO analysis and the expansion history is coded in the red# shifts so we can calculate expansion rates even from just say the lensing time delays but really# combining these data sets is the key what we're trying to do is fit a cosmological model with many# interacting or covariant parameters so we need measurements that will tease apart and constrain# all parameters and on that note there is one parameter that I haven't mentioned and that's the# clustering of galaxies over cosmic time galaxies are thrown apart by cosmic expansion but they also# fall together due to their mutual gravitational attraction the amount of this clustering tells# you stuff about the amount of dark matter in the universe and the size of the initial density# fluctuations both important parameters in your cosmological model so measuring this clustering# is a big help in constraining that model galaxy red shift surveys like desi can do this directly# to some extent based on the clustering of the galaxies that they can see but there are also# more cunning approaches that can take account of all the mass seen or unseen for example through# weak gravitational lensing the lensing I already talked about where you see multiple images of one# object is called strong lensing in weak lensing the gravitational field of galaxies and clusters# slightly warp the shapes of background objects without actually producing multiple images in the# case of a weakly lensed galaxy it'll be slightly stretched in one direction you can't identify# the effect with a single galaxy because you don't know what shape that galaxy was originally but# imagine many galaxies in a particular direction that normally have random orientations relative# to each other as their light travels to us it passes around let's say a particularly dense# patch of the universe the orientations of all those galaxies will be skewed at right angles# to that patch and become correlated with each other by looking at the correlations of galaxy# shapes across the entire sky you can get a crude density map of the universe which in turn allows# us to constrain galaxy clustering the desi result that made all this news is from their second data# release 3 years into the 5-year survey and with 30 out of the planned 50 million galaxies and# quazars actually if the deviation from constant dark energy is real it seems likely that this# extra signal will get them over the five sigma level but Desi is not the only game in town nor# the only thing needed to reduce that uncertainty we should not confuse Desi with DE for example# that's the dark energy survey des observes a factor of 10 more galaxies than Desi but where# Desi takes spectra of known galaxies Des takes images at different wavelengths and actually# discovers galaxies that makes DE an imaging or phototric survey where DESIE is a spectroscopic# survey de measures phototric red shifts which are less accurate than DESI's spectroscopic# red shifts but take much less time to observe des also doesn't see as far as DESIE so isn't# sensitive to the expansion history instead DES is good at measuring the latetime expansion rate# as well as the growth of structure via clustering and weak lensing measurements it's also important# for nailing down them pesky supernova really DESI is complimentary to dese giving the late time# constraints just as the CMBB gives the initial conditions but perhaps the greatest improvement on# these results will be from very new and upcoming surveys we have the European Space Ay's Uklid# satellite which is studying over a billion galaxies with both imaging and spectroscopy and# his most important cosmological contribution is by measuring galaxy clustering and weak lensing this# should allow us to beat down the uncertainty in the equation of state parameters to the 1% level# which moves us toward a precision measurement of dark energy uklid is in the first of its six-year# mission and the first cosmological results are expected next year and the last and perhaps for# me most exciting endeavor is the legacy survey of space and time LSST on the Reuben Observatory this# is a phototric survey that does something very new it'll map much of the southern sky many many times# for 10 years besides complmenting or improving on desi deaths and uklid lsst will add the dimension# of time to the analysis perhaps the most important benefits to cosmology are the measuring of# many hundreds of thousands of type 1A supernova providing an incredible late time anchor for the# other surveys lsst will also enable measurement of those time delays in the gravitational# lens quazars which if you remember give us an expansion history independent of supernova# but LSST will only do this after discovering something like 20 times more lensed quazars than# we currently know of so this method should really come into its own with LSST we are entering the# era of precision cosmology it's really a golden era for the field and in this next decade you# can expect the cosmic expansion history and the general cosmological model to become known# to a precision that seemed impossible not long ago with that precision comes the ability to ask# what kind of physics can produce such a universe what kind of dark energy dark matter starting# conditions and what does that mean for how the universe will end we will know it all just as# soon as we've finished surveying all of spaceime
Support for PBS provided by: